There’s huge interest across the sector right now as Martyn’s Law moves closer to reality — and with every update from the SIA or Home Office, the conversation gets a little louder. But despite all the noise, the fundamentals remain the same: the law isn’t active yet, and organisations currently have no legal duties under the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act. The SIA has been clear that there is a minimum two‑year implementation period following Royal Assent in April 2025. Full regulatory go‑live isn’t expected until Spring 2027, when Parliament formally commences the regime.

Behind the scenes, real progress is being made. The SIA is developing a secure digital portal for duty holder registration, completing its Section 12 operational guidance, and growing its regulatory teams so they’re ready for future inspections and compliance work. Meanwhile, the Home Office has released new ProtectUK materials that help organisations understand the likely scope and structure of the regime — though these are early preparations rather than definitive compliance standards.

What’s proving more challenging is the surge of consultants and suppliers marketing ‘Martyn’s Law compliance’ packages before the rulebook has even been released. The SIA has warned directly that no one can credibly sell compliance solutions at this stage, because the statutory guidance that defines expectations simply hasn’t been published. Its message is clear: organisations should avoid unnecessary spending until the official guidance lands.

This has created an unusual moment for the industry — the law is undoubtedly coming, the regulator is preparing, but the marketplace is already crowded with self-proclaimed experts who claim to know exactly how to get organisations compliant. Until the rules are finalised, the safest approach remains the calmest one: stay close to official updates, use the free ProtectUK resources, build your understanding of your risks, and avoid being pushed into premature commitments by anyone promising guaranteed compliance before the law even starts.

This is exactly where TIAA’s Security Advisory function is designed to help. Rather than offering ‘compliance packages’ for a law that hasn’t begun, our focus is on credible, proportionate, evidence‑based preparation. We support organisations by assessing existing security arrangements, identifying practical vulnerabilities, and helping duty holders understand what ‘reasonably practicable’ measures might look like in their context. Our advisors draw on policing, counter‑terrorism, intelligence and protective security experience to guide organisations sensibly through the uncertainty — not by guessing what the law might require, but by strengthening core security practices that will stand up regardless of future legislation.

As the regulatory picture sharpens, we will continue to help organisations interpret the statutory guidance, plan proportionate measures, prepare documentation, train their teams, and navigate the SIA’s expectations once the inspection framework is live. Our role isn’t to sell badges or quick fixes; it’s to provide trusted, informed support that grows with the legislation and keeps organisations on solid ground throughout the journey.

Martyn’s Law will reshape the landscape of public protection in the years ahead. Until the regime formally begins, the best path forward is steady preparation — and when organisations need genuine expertise rather than speculation, TIAA’s Security Advisory team is here to guide them every step of the way.

TIAA’s Security Advisory Services are here to help. Our experts can guide you through the practical, ethical, and operational aspects of deploying advanced surveillance solutions, ensuring compliance, resilience, and peace of mind. Contact us today to explore tailored strategies that protect your people, assets, and reputation.

Jonathan Gladwin,  Director – Security Advisory 

Carver Tedstone, Managing Consultant Security Advisory  

To view the previous blogs in the series please visit TIAA Blogs